?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Glare, Grouchy

[Rant] Copyright

As this has been getting discussed in the discussion groups of both Katherine Kerr and Megan Lindholm (Robin Hobb) over the past few weeks, it's been on my mind lately. Today I got a note on a game I help keep running that a couple users were using one of the communication venues in the game to discuss how best to trade around cracked games and whatnot.

Grawwwwrgh.

There are some zealots, I admit, who really do believe that authors should release books for free and copyright shouldn't exist at all, or that all software should be free. Putting aside the question of 'if it's free, you are unlikely to make money on it, and there's no incentive to actually work on it as opposed to getting a different job,' there are other considerations.

Without copyright, for instance, someone could take a book and decide they want to publish their own version of it. They alter it -- cutting scenes, and adding a few they think are better -- and release their own revised edition with the same byline. The author's message is no longer there, and you no longer have any guarantee that you're getting the actual /book/ and not just someone's mutant edited copy.

Add to that the fact that our copyright laws were specifically altered some time ago to adhere to the Berne Convention guidelines, so that our copyright would be enforced and upheld by other countries who are signatories to it.

Really, what it boils down to, I think, is that the majority of people who pirate stuff do it because it's simple (just download something!) and it's free (and people are all about the free stuff). And all the arguments about how it 'doesn't hurt anyone' or how it 'only hurts the publishers' are largely just justifications. And 'I wouldn't have bought it anyway' doesn't really count for anything. If you wouldn't have bought it anyway, that's no excuse for theft. Hey, I wouldn't have bought that DVD player, but that makes it okay to steal it! Bzzt.

If you can convince yourself you're taking a Moral Stand against Big Business or whatever, you don't have to think about the fact that you are stealing from the people who wrote that game you're enjoying so much, that piece of software you use every day, composed and performed those songs you just downloaded in MP3, or wrote that book you just downloaded in eBook format.

The immaturity shows in a number of ways in the pirate community. Witness people who cheerfully accept acclaim and praise for making pirated goods available; the eBook scanners who cheerily accept the acclaim and thanks of the various pirates, acting as if the books were their own work. Hell, think about our Russian hacker friends who have an entire site devoted to Trillian as if it were their work, when all they're doing is distributing pirated copies of Trillian Pro and plugins.

I'm halfway tempted to talk to some of the authors, game developers and so on who I know, and ask them each to write a short essay on copyright and piracy, and collect them into a freely-available eBook to distribute on the net...

Comments

But selling mix tapes off of the radio was less of a problem -- though it was a problem -- in terms of range of distribution. Bootlegs have always been around, but before you often had to send off for a bootleg, wait however long, or track down a place to buy one. Even if it was a little more expensive, picking up the actual album was generally less hassle! Suddenly, however, you can toss an MP3 up on Gnutella and voila, anyone who wants it can pick it up from the comfort of their own bedroom or living room.

I don't get why you feel they're justified in 'taking pride' in their work by adding their own name and claiming credit for someone else's work. If someone spends two years writing an RPG manual, and someone spends two days scanning it into PDFs to distribute illegally? I absolutely and completely disagree with you that they deserve to take as much pride in the release as the actual authors do. And when they get irked that someone else goes and makes a slightly smaller PDF out of theirs, and puts /their/ name on it, and post angrily to boards that /they/ did all the work of scanning, and they should be getting the credit... that just seems freakin' hypocritical.

If someone spends two years making a video game, and people spend two weeks cracking it and release it with the crack placing their pirate group's logo into the game, I do find it lame that they accept the accolades of the pirates who download it... and moreso, that they get upset when someone else copies their crack and claim they're being cheated? Seems hypocritical.

If someone spends a bunch of time writing an instant messenger client and folks spend a day or two removing the protection from the commercial copy and distribute it, and take glee in the accolades of the masses, it seems hypocritical of them to complain when someone puts their pirated copy of it up on a competing site.

I call it immature because they clearly understand how irritating it is to have someone else claim credit for your work... and they do not care, unless it affects them directly. If you can come up with a way to justify that as mature behavior? I'd love to hear it.

As for fixes...

In my experience, a percentage of pirates -- a small one, but measurable nonetheless -- feel a great deal of guilt over the act of pirating once they realize that the artists whose work they are appreciating are harmed by the copyright violations and do not appreciate pirates. And upon realizing this, change their tune.

There is no easy 'quick fix' to the moral decline, or the 'I want a free lunch' aspect. But as you yourself point out, educating people as to why it's wrong is a good first start. Based on what I've seen in discussions elsewhere and seen in personal experience, I think the collection of essays might actually reach a few people and, even if it doesn't make them change their ways, might at least make them think about it, and about the moralistic justifications many use.
As I said, the matter of taking pride in an accomplishment is not immature. That's just a fact. What they are taking pride in, however, is an activity that is either immature or criminal. Getting pissed off for soemone doing the same thing to them and taking pride in it is immature. But the act of taking pride in your work is NOT. Even if everything surrounding it may be.